Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-022
Original file (2009-022.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 
 
                                                                                BCMR Docket No. 2009-222 
 
XXXXXXXXXXXX 
XXXXXXXXXXXX 
   

 

 
 

FINAL DECISION 

 
 
This proceeding was conducted according to the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and 
section  425  of  title  14  of  the  United  States  Code.    The  Chair  docketed  the  application  upon 
receipt  of  the  applicant’s  completed  application  and  military  records  on August  4,  2009,  and 
subsequently prepared the final decision as required by 33 C.F.R. § 52.61(c). 
 
 
appointed members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case. 
 

This  final  decision,  dated  May  13,  2010,  is  approved  and  signed  by  the  three  duly 

APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS 

 
 
The applicant asked the Board to correct his record so that he is compensated for 34 days 
of leave charged to him while he was in a not fit for duty (NFFD) status. The applicant alleged 
that the Coast Guard violated its policy by placing him on annual leave while he was NFFD. 
 
 
The  applicant  was  a  reservist  performing  active  duty  when  he  was  placed  in  a  NFFD 
status  from  August  8,  2007  to  September  19,  2007,  while  undergoing  treatment  for  a  back 
condition.  According to the Coast Guard, the applicant was charged with 31 days of leave during 
the 43 days that he was not NFFD.   The applicant’s active duty orders were scheduled to expire 
on July 30, 2007, but were extended because the applicant was undergoing medical treatment.  
He was released from active duty on September 24, 2007. 
 

VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD 

 
 
On December 18, 2009, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted 
a memorandum in which he adopted the comments provided by Commander, Personnel Service 
Center (PSC), as the Coast Guard’s advisory opinion.  PSC recommended that the Board grant 
the following relief:  “[That] partial relief be granted in that 31 days of leave be credited to the 
applicant along with any associated pay and entitlements.” 
 

In this regard, PSC stated that according to Article 7.A.2.e. of the Personnel Manual, sick 
leave  is  a  period  of  authorized  absence  granted  to  persons  while  under  medical  care  and 
treatment and is not chargeable as leave.   PSC stated that since the applicant was deemed NFFD 
from  August  8,  2007  to  September  19,  2007,  by  competent  medical  authority,  the  leave 
associated with that status for the entire 43-day period should have been attributed to sick leave 
in accordance with policy.  PSC recommended that the applicant receive any pay or entitlement 
as a result of the 31 days that were erroneously charged to him as leave while he was NFFD.   
 

APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD 

 
 
On January 4, 2010, the Board received the applicant’s reply to the views of the Coast 
Guard.  He  accepted  the  Coast  Guard’s  offer  that  he  receive  pay  for  the  31  days  of  leave 
erroneously charged to him while he was in a NFFD status.  
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the applicant's 

 
 
military record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submissions, and applicable law: 
 

1.  The Board has jurisdiction concerning this matter pursuant to section 1552 of title 10 

of the United States Code.  The application was timely.    
 
 
2.  The JAG found, and the Board agrees, that the Coast Guard committed an error by 
charging the applicant leave for a portion of the period he was NFFD, instead of granting him 
sick leave for that entire period from August 8, 2007 to September 19, 2007.  Article 7.A.2.e. 
states that sick leave is not chargeable as leave.  Therefore, the Board agrees with the JAG that 
the 31 days of leave charged to the applicant during the NFFD period should be returned to him.  
The leave is then to be sold back to the government.  
 
 
accordance with the advisory opinion and the applicant’s reply to the advisory opinion.  
 

3.    Accordingly,  the  applicant’s  request  for  relief  should  be  partially  granted  in 

[ORDER AND SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 

 

 
 

ORDER 

 

The  application  of  XXXXXXXXXXX,  USCGR  (Ret.),  for  correction  of  his  military 
record  is  granted,  in  part,  as  follows.    His  record  shall  be  corrected  to  show  that  he  was  not 
charged with 31 days of leave between August 8, 2007 and September 19, 2007, but that he was 
authorized sick leave for this entire period.  His record shall be further corrected to show that he 
sold the 31 days of leave back to the government upon his release from active duty on September 
24, 2007.  The Coast Guard shall pay him the amount due as a result of this correction. 

  

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 Donna M. Bivona 

 

 

 
 Nancy L. Friedman 

 

 

 
 Dorothy J. Ulmer 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-187

    Original file (2008-187.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finally, the applicant stated, he was advised that he could sell 40.5 days of leave and also have 20 days of administrative absence,4 which he requested in an email to the YN2 on July 19, 2007. • Later that evening, a YN1 at the ISC sent an email to both the YN2 and the applicant stat- ing that he had misinterpreted the Personnel Manual and that administrative leave could be taken in increments.5 • On the morning of July 19, 2007, the applicant sent the YN2 an email saying that “[t]he new...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2005-081

    Original file (2005-081.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although Applicant did have many appointments during the 18 months prior to his retirement from active duty, Applicant took approximately 42 days of leave during the period of time between May 2003 and August 2004. CGPC stated that the applicant's March 31, 2005 leave and earnings statement showed that the applicant had already sold 31 days of leave during his military career and that he sold an additional 29 days of accrued leave upon his retirement, for a total of 60 days. The applicant...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-096

    Original file (2008-096.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The applicant stated that the Coast Guard denied his 2008 request to have the 18 days of leave restored, even though he qualified for SLA. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On August 12, 2008, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted a memorandum in which he adopted the comments provided by Commander, Coast Guard Personnel Command...

  • CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2008-096

    Original file (2008-096.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The applicant stated that the Coast Guard denied his 2008 request to have the 18 days of leave restored, even though he qualified for SLA. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On August 12, 2008, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted a memorandum in which he adopted the comments provided by Commander, Coast Guard Personnel Command...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2012-001

    Original file (2012-001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PSC stated that through the NOE, the applicant was authorized medical care and treat- ment from her RELAD date through May 31, 2011, and was eligible for incapacitation pay for the same period, although she only requested incapacitation pay for the first 90 days. § 12301(h) states that a member may be voluntarily ordered to active duty or retained on active duty to receive authorized medical care. Under Chapter 6.B.3.a., a “Notice of Eligibility (NOE) for authorized medical treatment is...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-190

    Original file (2007-190.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no record of the applicant requesting to sell such leave and the applicant has not leave to sell substantiated an error or injustice on the part of the Coast Guard with regards to the sale of leave. Therefore, no error was committed, if as alleged, the Coast Guard failed to counsel the applicant about the opportunity to sell leave. The Coast Guard failed to counsel the applicant on a page 7 about his SRB opportunity when he reenlisted as required by the Personnel Manual.

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2012-123

    Original file (2012-123.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    § 182(b) and (c)(1), a cadet who does not complete the course of instruction at the Coast Guard Academy may be transferred to the Reserve and “order[ed] to active duty for such period of time as the Secretary prescribes (but not to exceed four years).” Summary of Past Actions Month Sept. 2007 July 2009 June 2010 Feb. 2012 Action Enlisted for 6 years of active duty Discharged (DD 214) and reenlisted for 2 years Discharged (DD 214) and appointed a cadet Disenrolled, discharged (DD 214),...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-015

    Original file (2010-015.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. Effective 1 September 2008, members who are currently serving on an indefinite reenlistment contract are authorized to enter into a new indefinite reenlistment, one time, during a career for the purpose of selling leave. Therefore, the Board does not know for certain (a) whether the applicant actually had 60 days of accrued, unused leave to...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2009-136

    Original file (2009-136.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated January 14, 2010, is approved and signed by the three duly RELIEF REQUESTED AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he earned the Good Conduct Medal for his service that ended on December 31, 1975. PSC stated that the application should be denied because it was untimely. The BCMR has jurisdiction of the case pursuant to section 1552 of title 10, United of the applicant and the Coast Guard, the military record of the...

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2010-192

    Original file (2010-192.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds that it would be an injustice, however, for the applicant to be denied reserve retired pay after serving for over 20 years in the armed forces because he enlisted in the regular Coast Guard instead of the Coast Guard Reserve. Accordingly, the Board finds that the applicant’s record should be corrected to show that his 1979 and 1983 Coast Guard enlistments were in the Reserve component of the Coast Guard. According to Article 8.C.16 of the Reserve Policy Manual, the fact...